This afternoon Maher and I were in the library sampling some iced beverages from the Starbucks there when I heard somebody moaning really loudly behind me. I snuck a glance over my shoulder and saw what I thought to be a retarded guy sitting at a computer making noise.
Suddenly the guy stiffened up and started convulsing. I turned and looked as he fell out of his chair and started writhing on the ground, moaning and screaming. I’ve never seen a seizure before, but it was fairly interesting. The barrista called 911 while Maher and I went over to try to help somehow. We really didn’t know what to do, so we worked to keep him on his side so that he didn’t drown in his spit and vomit until the paramedics arrived. ‘Twas quite interesting.
After the ordeal, Maher looked pretty depressed/pissed. I asked him why that was, and his reply was merely, “sometimes I really hate the devil.”
I asked him why on earth he was thinking about such a thing at that moment. Where did he see the devil in that event? He told me that conditions like seizures were caused by Satan.
Of course, this left me feeling puzzled. I responded by saying that the cause for the seizure was rather due to the negligence of the guy in forgetting to take his medicine, because it was in fact a recurring ordeal for him, and it was probably onset by one of the flashing banners on Myspace which he was looking at at the time. The onset could have been stopped had the guy taken his medicine. Was Maher suggesting that the devil’s effect can be stopped merely by a medicinal product?
He then basically said that we have become a little too quick to explain away everything that was previously attributed to the devil. I inwardly scoffed at this statement, thinking that of course, things have changed a great deal, and now people realize that not everything that happens around them is the result of a direct command by Satan or demons.
I started delving into that thought a little later though. What are the implications of the fact that everything previously attributed to the devil can now be explained scientifically? There are a lot of mentions of the devil and demons and such in the bible. It was an understood fact back then that spirits had a lot of influence on the world. When I think about that though, I often say, “well yeah, they didn’t have the means to explain it back then, so they used spiritual terms. They described extraordinary occurrences the only way they knew how.”
This train of thought immediately leads me into dangerous and all-too-familiar territory though. If it is so easy for me to explain away demons and spiritual warfare, then what of all of the New Testament? Is it not possible that Jesus was turned – through people and stories – into God simply because he was so great it was inexplicable to the people then? Could it not all be some sort of Life of Brian escapade? After all, the first gospel was not written until at least 30 years after Jesus’ death. I’m pretty sure most word of mouth stories change quite drastically after 30 years. Everything gets blown out of proportion, and details get blown to the wind.
Certainly, some people call this sort of talk heresy. How can I possibly doubt the 100% validity of the Holy Bible, written by God himself? The thing is… every single book was written by a human. Humans – however well-intentioned they are – tend to fabricate and stretch things. I have no doubt that the Bible is based in the truth, and it’s principles are what we should use to guide our lives. But is it infallible? I think not…
No, I’m not necessarily doubting the divinity of Jesus. I’m just wondering; how much of the Bible is… stretching the truth? I hate this kind of thinking, because it never gets me anywhere. Why do I have to be so questioning and logical? I just want to accept things. I know that I will never be able to logically explain everything concerning God, so why do I seek explanations so fervently? Oh well, I’ll accept things when my brain gets old and lazy I guess. That seems to be the trend.